Brought to you by NZCity

 | main | news | security | policing 24 Oct 2019 | 
 Main NZ law and order news
Send a link to this article to a friend via email
 Sexual Crime
 White Collar
 Child Abuse
 Political & Misc.

 Crime news
 Home security
 Business security
 Security services
 Policing NZ
 NZ Parole Board
 Kidz Korner
 Firearms in NZ

 For Victims
 Drug Abuse
 Alcohol Abuse
 Legal Resources
 Crime Statistics
 Family Violence
 Support Services
 About Us
 Contact Us

Click here to add to your NZCity Personal Start Page

Vicky Calder - The Defence
Defence Counsel, Judith Ablett-Kerr, is described in No Verdict as having ‘lent the trial a force seldom seen in a New Zealand courtroom’. It reports that she ‘stunned many Crown witnesses (with her) aggressive cross-examination.’ She also displayed an impressive scientific knowledge and was able to discredit much of the scientific testimony.
The defence’s position was that Calder was innocent. Although she was vengeful and had done some stupid things, this did not make her a poisoner. Why would she have used a readily traceable poison (as claimed by the Crown) and that if she had attempted to murder Lloyd, would she not have been intelligent enough to have got rid of evidence such as cut up clothing and angry letters?

Next related article: Forward to Vicky Calder - Judge’s summing upVicky Calder - Judge’s summing up
Prev related article: Back to Vicky Calder - The first trialVicky Calder - The first trial

Back to Vicky Calder ( The Professor David Lloyd Poisoning Case) Index

© 2019 NZCity
For marketing opportunities contact: